I've started this blog to share with those that may be interested in sports, books, topical news and the justice system as it applies to cyberspace and generally.
Thursday, November 11, 2010
Oh dear, another family stalker gone.
What's wrong Maryanne Newton (once was dustproof,) cat got your tongue?
Who is left among the family stalkers? Christine, apparently not. Could be just Trevor, Stockdale and Denise, how long will they last?
After extensive inquiries I think I've found the answer. Maryanne Newton and Christine William shoved the cat up Rachael Membery's bottom (or ass, for those that don't know what a bottom is.) That is the reason why, when Rachael had her 36th go at the Miss Otorohanga Title, getting her motorised scooter to the front for the fall off the stage, there was seen a wagging tail coming from her bottom, or ass if you like. So very predickaberry.
What ever possessed Trademe to allow her back after she was banned the first time. She is rude, obnoxious and one very nasty piece of rubbish. Wonder who she will reinvent herself as?
Anonymous above... I think it was and is a serious mistake for Trade Me to have let these posters (such as Maryanne Newton) back after their bannings for the very reason that there behaviour breached the Harrassment Act civil Codes and probably the Criminal Code as well. I genuinely feel that Trade Me have shown that they are a little out of their depth with organised hate-groups, and they may be the first message board in NZ that has had this problem in a consistent, methodical way. Having said that, Trade Me have displayed confusion over differentiating between abuse (swearing etc) compared to actual stalking, and spreading hate. They've missed the bus on that to this point, but it will and is changing - a momentum is building within the Judiciary among lawyers and else where for cyber space to be restrained into lawfulness. I'm heartily sick of people like Mike Stockdale blatantly lying, being caught out and still allowed to post on TM accusing David Bain, Joe Karam or someone else involved with the case as being liars. Stockdale and Taylor had the temerity to say the blood in the barrel was a myth, they've formed their opinions without comprehensive knowledge of the case and abuse and confused what free speech is. As for dustproof re-inventing herself, well the hate-siters have a pedigree for that and are always the first to accuse others of being re-inventions from a high horse, Christine Williams, Glenda O Brien, Annette Curran to name a few and of course good old holier than thou bser nina_s who has operated more that five different accounts. I've always suspected that nina_s is on the payroll of somebody and the up and coming court case might shed some light on that.
Surprising that you haven't had a response from Kent Parker, I have found that any criticism to him gets an immediate put-down and one is told to buzz off. He's very much a reactionary and fond of his own intellect yet disparaging towards others.
good riddance to another nasty stalker! now dustproof & misspw can dedicate themselves to finding the missing cat!
ReplyDeleteAfter extensive inquiries I think I've found the answer. Maryanne Newton and Christine William shoved the cat up Rachael Membery's bottom (or ass, for those that don't know what a bottom is.) That is the reason why, when Rachael had her 36th go at the Miss Otorohanga Title, getting her motorised scooter to the front for the fall off the stage, there was seen a wagging tail coming from her bottom, or ass if you like. So very predickaberry.
ReplyDeleteWhat ever possessed Trademe to allow her back after she was banned the first time. She is rude, obnoxious and one very nasty piece of rubbish. Wonder who she will reinvent herself as?
ReplyDeleteAnonymous above...
ReplyDeleteI think it was and is a serious mistake for Trade Me to have let these posters (such as Maryanne Newton) back after their bannings for the very reason that there behaviour breached the Harrassment Act civil Codes and probably the Criminal Code as well. I genuinely feel that Trade Me have shown that they are a little out of their depth with organised hate-groups, and they may be the first message board in NZ that has had this problem in a consistent, methodical way. Having said that, Trade Me have displayed confusion over differentiating between abuse (swearing etc) compared to actual stalking, and spreading hate. They've missed the bus on that to this point, but it will and is changing - a momentum is building within the Judiciary among lawyers and else where for cyber space to be restrained into lawfulness. I'm heartily sick of people like Mike Stockdale blatantly lying, being caught out and still allowed to post on TM accusing David Bain, Joe Karam or someone else involved with the case as being liars. Stockdale and Taylor had the temerity to say the blood in the barrel was a myth, they've formed their opinions without comprehensive knowledge of the case and abuse and confused what free speech is.
As for dustproof re-inventing herself, well the hate-siters have a pedigree for that and are always the first to accuse others of being re-inventions from a high horse, Christine Williams, Glenda O Brien, Annette Curran to name a few and of course good old holier than thou bser nina_s who has operated more that five different accounts. I've always suspected that nina_s is on the payroll of somebody and the up and coming court case might shed some light on that.
Surprising that you haven't had a response from Kent Parker, I have found that any criticism to him gets an immediate put-down and one is told to buzz off. He's very much a reactionary and fond of his own intellect yet disparaging towards others.
ReplyDelete