I think you and your mate van beynan have already been warned to lay off the Christchurch Jury Stockdale. I'd take that advice if I was you at least until the investigation of you and Neil Purkiss has been completed, after that you might be able to do your daily reports from your own Court case, that could be fun. You'll be able to wear a t shirt with 'Pedo Supporter's Club' emblazoned on the chest, I don't think you'll find any of the Juror's wanting to hug you though Mike.
I note you still going round and round on Trade Me, desperately trying to prove something to yourself. You must be one of the few people in New Zealand that doesn't understand what not guilty means, even when it's said five times.
I see you bsing away, but you can't get past these that follow from Dempster and Laney, let alone the other biggies like Daddy's dna in the rifle and the upward trajectory shot, or those intimate samples, you're still stuck claiming the rifle was wiped down, you're ten years out of touch Mike.
Dempster..He could not say how old the bruise on the back of the hand was. It could have been anything from minutes to 24 hours.
Dempster again.....a Crown pathologist has conceded that defence explanations on how Robin Bain could have shot himself are feasible and 'quite likely.'
Dempster again....he agreed the test shots with the rifle fired at pig skin tended to support his INITIAL impression that Robin Bain's wound was close contact..
You've never got to the bottom of those intimate swabs have you Stockdale, your co-offender bser mate linzo tried to say they were oral swabs. Why would they take oral swabs from a witness Mike? But they weren't oral swabs at all, we all know that Mike, even you.
And just another to help you out with your garbled nonsense that David was hanging around outside the house to be 'seen,' Mrs Laney said she saw 'the paperboy squeezing into the gate at 65 Every Street.' That was at 6.45 Mike, after the computer was switched on. That's why you are trying everything you can to lie about the case, claim to know more about that Jurors because your pedo mate was identified by them as the killer when the Jury were asked 'Was it Robin or was it David.' So you're hot on them, stalk them and defame them, but don't get too comfortable Mike you could end up in a worse situation than campmother, stalking and outing a Jury is very serious.
And he's not the only one. We now have obook, back with his snide implications that someone is persisting in stalking and denigrating jurors, when he says in relation to Linz4me's comment about jury behaviour: "there's more to come".
ReplyDeleteThey seem to think that by running down the jury they can achieve something. The truth is, any jury would have reached the same verdict. It was inevitable. The Crown tried hard (they did not, as someone claimed, 'throw' the retrial) but they just didn't have the proof they needed to gain a conviction. Why didn't they? because David Bain didn't do it, his father did.
obook is a pathetic wee man who aspired to be a boxer, later claimed he would become a forensic psychiatrist, he's ex Dunedin and hiding in West Auckland living as a plagiarist and selling knick knacks. He's quite right when he says 'there's more to come' although he doesn't apparently understand for whom such things shall arrive and has forgotten the adage 'reap what you sow.'
ReplyDeleteHis public comments about the Jury are well recorded, but he may yet face other additional difficulties because he was for a long time, before going into hiding with nina_s, a spirited defamer of Joe Karam.
Ultimately everyone is to blame except for the idiots who frock themselves in sycophantic worship of a dead fiddler.