Another hard fought competition between the twisted sisters. But Christine (misspw, millie231) gets it for showing her/his ongoing committment to bsing. Christine says she has a copy of the trial transcript. She zeroes in on this humdinger from her, barren for lust, imagination...
But they were in the other rooms as well. Each of the police that was in charge of a room seemed to be reporting bullets at every turn. It was incredible. Sometimes it is important to look at the big picture rather than the details, to not just look at the evidence from one witness but put the whole picture together. It was creepy. The girls didn't handle guns, Margaret didn't, Stephen may have when David let him because it wasn't his gun and Robin wasn't there or that interested in using one. No, the gun fanatic was David and that was born out in the evidence from witnesses.
Edited by misspw at 7:03 pm, Sun 12 Sep
Quotemisspw (65 ) 7:02 pm, Sun 12 Sep #27199
...in fact the rifle expert (or fanatic as the stalker refers) was Robin Bain, dear daddy. She says, 'It was incredible. Sometimes it is important to look at the big picture rather than the details, to not just look at the evidence from one witness but put the whole picture together.' How true, pity she in her twisted ways is unable to apply being able to look at 'the whole picture together' because she would have seen that Robin was a long time hunter and conversant with the use of firearms for the greater part of his life, he was a regular user of firearms and in the days leading to the murders had been trying to procure a rifle, that having failed - he took his son's rifle from his son's room shortly after the young man had left to deliver papers, then he killed his remaining family before shooting himself. His daughter, Laniet, about whom evidence was given that she was a victim of sexual abuse from her father, died more slowly than the others. It appears she was deliberately wounded before probably being finished off later. Witnesses gave evidence that Laniet was about to reveal more broadly the abuse from her father. Other witnesses revealed Robin's hunting prowess, and the number of spent cartridges (22) in his caravan, there was one live cartridge found among those but by then he was already dead. So Christine, and her multiple identities, gets the moron's award for assuming that she should be believed despite being revealed many times over as a liar. Congratulations Christine, you are the moron of the week.
She may be now professing to look at the whole picture but she is incapable of it. She, like all of the idiots and in particular nina_s and linz4me have their pride to get over. They will only ever have foremost in their minds the result they were hoping so desperately for, David Bain guilty. What they don't understand is you cannot look at the whole picture when you are blinded by your own stupidity. KISS
ReplyDeleteWhat they are clearly demonstrating now is that they never knew the evidence in the beginning before they made up their minds. Of course they will only see in the evidence that which suits them now. I note their excitement which betrays their lack of knowledge of the case. It is not about excitement to reach an already decided conclusion, it's about understanding the evidence and letting the evidence tell its own story. We are witnessing dumb people frantic to finally prove that a round peg will fit in a square hole. It would be amusing if not for the terrible damage they continue to cause.
ReplyDeleteThat is not what Dr Dempster said, I suggest you consult the Court Transcripts, between pages 1622-1636. It is quite specific what Dr Dempster said regarding the age of the injury in question.
ReplyDeleteproject_hr (2208 ) 10:46 am, Sun 22 Aug #91
I have the transcript and it is the second trial not the first.
project_hr is some hypocrite.
Do you have permission from the judge to cite information from the transcript on the TMMB project_hr?
Edited by misspw at 3:47 pm, Mon 13 Sep
Quote misspw (65 ) 3:40 pm, Mon 13 Sep #27257
How stupid can anyone be, Christine Williams certainly deserves this award. ProjectHR wasn't quoting the transcripts directly. Anyone can refer to them.
There's a big difference between refering to, and directly copying from, especially when you are copying from an unauthorised transcript that you have obtained without permission of the Court. I seem to remember ProjectH telling them they couldn't be copied without permission. Pisseyspew should have listened to him.
Someone really needs to explain to her, in simple terms, that she is breaking the law. Obviously someone has told her she's untouchable, and she thought they were meaning by the law!
Moronic doesn't come close to describing this unfortunate woman.
ReplyDeleteShe reminds me of a bank robber who writes his name and phone number on the bottom of his demand note.
"I've got the second trial transcripts" - Christine Williams.
Great Christine, now explain who gave them to you, so the Court's know who to contact.