Of course a hate-site has no interest in the truth or anything that might devalue its credibility. A visit to any of the hate-sites set up to focus persecution of David Bain have the foregoing bias in abundance. Over a period of time I may bring forward many of the myths they perpetuate, while at the same time revealing from evidence what the facts are, whether being one sided or having two possible interpretations either favouring or not favouring the dismantled case against David Bain.
I have three specific instances to relate here, but first I want to deal with the perpetuated myth that David used the paper round as an alibi. At the outset such a proposition is of keen interest because we have all heard of alibis and know that an alibi is someone saying I couldn't have committed that crime because I was elsewhere at the time. A failed alibi might well be a sure sign of guilt. The Crown crowed loudly about the paper-run alibi, but as most often happens with fabrications, added to the effect. These 'additions,' also the evidence of Mrs Laney, and the turn on time of the computer showed that the paper run was never an alibi, however, Mrs Laney's evidence and the calculated computer bootup time were. The Crown went out of the way to 'show' that David 'drew' attention to himself on the paper round to prove he had delivered the papers. I'm sure some people swallowed that, others may have been more interested in the time given by Mrs Laney when she saw David and what the computer turn on time was agreed to be.
Mrs Laney's time of seeing David and the computer turn on time were never compatible with the David as killer scenario, particularly after the full evidence was given by Mrs Laney and not supressed by the Crown as it had been in the first trial. Even fudging those times didn't put David in the house when Robin killed himself, to be generous and suggest that they did allow David to be in the house when Robin suicided required a remarkable sequence of events to have needed to occur, not least Robin's co-operation in his own death rather than his suicide as the Jury decided. There was no time for David to have been waiting for his father in the lounge alcove or having being able to shoot Robin with an upward trajectory shot that allowed an uninterrupted screen of dna and blood to spread across the lounge floor and onto the alcove curtain and simultaneously move in two directions of Robin's bent left leg.
All of those events aside, a simple question is forged which supplies its own answer. Why did David have to be seen delivering his passages and therefore having an alibi? The answer is, he didn't have to be seen at all that morning, simply the papers in the letter boxes proved without doubt that David had delivered them. Who else could have delivered them, so the alibi myth, proposed by the Police, when looked at closely is deception.
The three specific instances (mentioned above) where lies are used by hate-siters to try and 'prove' David's guilt.
1/ dcameron, a hate-siter and treasurer for bludged funds to go into kitty to save camp mother's rotten butt. This person claimed on Trade Me that she had seen photos of the scratches on David Bain's chest on the morning of the murders. This lie made by dcameron despite the fact that the police Doctor and two officers who were present when David was examined saw no scratches at all. When challenged about the whereabouts of the photos, in true hate-siters style dcameron said she had seen them in a lawyer's office where she 'worked.' Under pressure because no photos of such injuries were ever taken or produced, she claimed that were in a 'private' collection. So you have it, the hate-site treasurer, honest and straight forward kiwi is indeed a lying persecutor, lying deliberately to perpetuate the goals of her hate-site.
2/Kulkkulbelle; hate-site supporter and possible member, certainly a networker and confidant of hate-site members. This person posted on TM of having seen a pathologist's report which proved that Laniet had never had a baby or been pregnant. Of course when asked, many times over several weeks, she was unable to provide it - leaving us all to understand why, another that perpetuates mistruths to persecute someone found innocent.
3/jmgb51, another hate-site activist eagerly accepting the role to lie and mislead for the cause. This person is pre-occupied with stalking another poster and over a recent period of 14 or so days mentioned the posters christian name 61 times on the board despite the TM rules preventing people being identified or outed. jmgb51 is obviously a coward emboldened by his/her anonymity. As things progress with hate-siters, like weak men fortified by whisky, this person claimed that a poll showed over 80% of New Zealanders thought David suddenly guilty, (a dramatic - by illegitimate licence, shift of over 40%,) and again for the sole purpose of peresecuting an innocent man to protect the 'reputation' of a dead paedophile.
No comments:
Post a Comment