The following from the embittered linz4me on Trade Me:
I have never seen the names of the children in here but the children are named and photographs on display on a site created by the poster herself it gives their names, ages, interests and educational aspirations so therefore is in the public domain. There is a photo of the poster her marital status and her opinion of her partner also place in the public domain. As any media lawyer will tell you once you yourself place the information in the public domain it can back and bite you on the bum and the fault lays squarely with the person releasing the information. it is now public property just as the information I have released about myself, the difference being I am quietly pleased with the progress I have made back into the world of reality and I make the information available as it is possible it may help just one person. I can tell you there is far more more very personal information about me in the public domain than you can imagine and done with my knowledge and blessing to help others. I am not ashamed of who I am but I deeply regret some of the things I have done and have spent years going back and where possible making peace with people I have affected.
Quotelinz4me (274 ) 11:10 am, Fri 20 Aug #22147
Here we have myth building, an attempt at covering a stalker's tracks in order to re-victimise a victim. A clear case of blame the victim from a pill-popping reprobate (that's got a tune to it.)
I think we all understand that an anonymous poster on TM is guaranteed under the T&C to have their anonymity guaranteed. Posters are specifically told not to reveal the real identities of other posters, obviously subtle revelations to disguise the 'outing' also are restricted. The anonymous poster whose life outside TM was revealed in first by golfergold (Annette Curran) and her children by kalnovitch (Glenda OBrien,) who in otherwords had her contract of anonymity breached by TM and the above mention posters, was victimised by those actions to which she gave no sanction because her real name and her nondeplume should never have been connected on the boards by stalkers. This idiot linz4me proposes that once outed illegally, then the blame for that falls on the victim for having actually being a real person.
The particular outing goes further, because the hate-siters (on and off the TM boards) conducted a campaign against the person, encouraging each other to ring her work, talk to her 'boss' about an allegation that she was posting during work hours and so forth. She was also phoned at home during this time and quite justifiably was made afraid by these gutless people. One of the prime-movers in this attack was the hate-site sponsor and member Mike Stockdale. I've written about him before (TM name supersleuth,) he is the man that approached a Crown witness, presumably not identifying himself as a hate-site member, to discuss the witnesses evidence. He did this, despite as we all know, that the case is not concluded. Furthermore, this hateful man has stalked the jury - the details of which I have already posted.
So my message to you linz4me, is that nobody is fooled by you trying to blame the victim of public exposure to their own actions. Similarly, with the others you mention above the stalker kalnovitch and misspw, they're not victims, they're organised victimisers from the rotten hate-sites you inhabit in your sad lonely life.
But a question for you linz4me, how are you getting on for suing for having had your anonymous feelings hurt? You're an absolute dreamer. Sue me if you've got the guts or think that anything that I've published about you and your rotten, stalking mates is something I can't prove.
No comments:
Post a Comment