tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4909488748140942076.post3578274453116580146..comments2024-03-20T18:05:50.971+13:00Comments on NOSTALGIA-NZ: The Bain case, lost at the bookshop.Nostalgia-NZhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17048029433699816931noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4909488748140942076.post-80544071397966538052015-04-13T15:05:44.390+12:002015-04-13T15:05:44.390+12:00But the fact remains, there was NO forensic eviden...But the fact remains, there was NO forensic evidence on the lens & frames found in David's room. There was no blood splatter etc, and the dust on the lens, that would have made viewing through them difficult, still remained, so they had not been wiped down. If David had worn those spectacles to watch the video the previous night, as Stockdale claims, then to have seen the picture, they would have needed wiping. <br /><br />They're a distraction for absolute idiots - of which Stockdale meets the criteria. Beyondhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11762242098552451174noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4909488748140942076.post-84611444956578169592015-03-18T09:18:39.040+13:002015-03-18T09:18:39.040+13:00Yes, but my concern is that an optical illusion co...Yes, but my concern is that an optical illusion could have been believed to be a lens, considering that:<br />1. the visible floor area of Stephen Bain's room was 2 x 2 meters<br />2. the optical illusion, believed by all to be a lens leaning against a boot, was 45 centimeters from Stephen Bain's right foot.<br />3. Many human observers would have had a chance to see the claimed lens in the 80 hours and 32 minutes between its 'photograph', and its discovery which, as I recall, was made underneath the boot.<br />I watched the news every night of the first trial, and I don't remember any report that the lens was unseen for 80 hours.<br />The first report of that was by...Joe Karam.<br />I found Mike's email address, and want to ask him to write a book, with interviews of some of the believers present, asking them if they feel silly to have believed, now that they know that the optical illusion wasn't a lens.<br />Or, do they still believe that the optical illusion was a lens? And, if they do, how do they think the lens moved, from leaning against the boot, to its discovery position, underneath the boot?<br />As Joe said, it "deserves its own book".<br />Leehttp://superfly.co.nznoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4909488748140942076.post-25747726863971753262015-03-17T22:24:47.218+13:002015-03-17T22:24:47.218+13:00Lee/Nosty
I think the loons piece of fiction shoul...Lee/Nosty<br />I think the loons piece of fiction should have Marzuka to do the cartoons, I'd love to see his illustration of David wearing the lens, shooting people at point blank range, just for the sheer entertainment value. Am sure this book does contain a high degree of entertainment value!Rowannoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4909488748140942076.post-71685045104737696922015-03-17T20:48:34.018+13:002015-03-17T20:48:34.018+13:00It would be great wouldn't it Lee, the lens re...It would be great wouldn't it Lee, the lens remains as evidence of how David Bain was mistreated. The lens shows how a Miscarriage of Justice was constructed, it may even be the foremost foundation stone of that Miscarriage of Justice.Nostalgia-NZhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17048029433699816931noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4909488748140942076.post-75974772533351495592015-03-17T18:14:07.453+13:002015-03-17T18:14:07.453+13:00I haven't seen the publishing attempt, but I&#...I haven't seen the publishing attempt, but I'll repeat a quote from Joe Karam's first book:<br />"The eyeglass lens deserves its own book".<br />Someone needs to write that book.Leehttp://superfly.co.nznoreply@blogger.com